Skip to content

Cart

 

Your cart is empty

Titanium Earring Ball Back (1 Piece)


Sale price$7.95

Sold individually (1pc - ball end only)
Size: 18G or 20G
ASTM F-136 Titanium
Ball size: 4mm
Threadless
Alternative to butterfly backs


Free U.S Shipping on Orders Over $25
Free U.S Shipping on Orders Over $25
1,000's of 5 Star Reviews
1,000's of 5 Star Reviews
Rewards points on every purchase
Rewards points on every purchase

Threadless replacement ball backs for earring posts. Great alternative to butterfly backs. Fits size 18G or 20G earring posts. Ball size is 4mm. Made from ASTM F-136 titanium. Sold individually (1pc - ball end only).

Titanium Earring Ball Backs
Titanium Earring Ball Back (1 Piece) Sale price$7.95

Overall rating: 2.75 / 5 from 4 reviews.

AI Generated Review Summary

Summary topics

Review topics: [].

Review highlights

Reviews

Absolutely love

"This was exactly what I needed. I have some 20g earrings that were a gift and the backs screwed on. Well I couldn't screw them tight enough for them to lock cause my earlobes are thick. So I kept loosing the backs. These work perfect!"

Monnin M. (5/5)

These are ok. I like

"These are ok. I like the look but if you have nails it can be difficult to get them on as they are small."

Stephanie M. (4/5)

Waste of money - Falls off

"I’ve lost two earrings because these backs get loose very quickly and fall off. I’ve had earrings fall off several times and lost two. They’re also open at the back which defeats the purpose. I definitely would not buy again. They’re a waste of money."

Katrina (1/5)

Warning: These are open at both ends.

"I've been trying to find some way to keep my earrings in overnight, since even after a year the holes start to close up if I even take them out to sleep. Prong backs are no good because the sharp ends jab right into me when sleeping on my side, so these looked like an ideal solution, with a rounded back instead of a spiked one. I just got them and it turns out they're open at both ends, allowing the spike to pass right through, which is no different from a prong back. Useless."

Rachel (1/5)

Q&A

Recently Viewed